Inline engines: Design and application
![]() |
Dual overhead camshaft 3D model by Stone Law |
The Inline Engine is a simple and straightforward engine design. The cylinders of this kind of engine are arranged in a straight line, as indicated in the figure. Because all cylinders are in a single line, this engine is often referred to as a 'Straight Engine.'
![]() |
The MAN Diesel inline six-cylinder under construction in 1890s |
Boxer engine: Design and Application
The Boxer engine is the most common type of horizontally opposed engine, it is an internal combustion engine with opposing cylinders on each side of a central rotating crankshaft. When the cylinders are arranged in this manner, the opposing pistons move inward and outward simultaneously. Since 1897, Volkswagen and Subaru have used Boxer-four engines in cars. It has also been used in motorbikes and planes.
![]() |
Flat eight 1964 Porsche Typ 771 engine photo by Mario/ wikicommons |
Boxer vs. Inline
![]() |
Boxer Vs. Inline piston configuration |
Both boxer and inline layouts are based on internal combustion engines, but the design difference leads to pros and cons for each type. I've listed the major topics that matter when we compare these two engines. Which are: Complexity, Maintenance, Cost, Reliability, Size, Center of gravity, and balance. I will discuss each point to choose which engine is better in each category and which layout is the best.
Complexity
In inline engines, there is simply one cylinder bank and one head. Block castings are basic and straightforward to create. Furthermore, OHC engines require just one or two camshafts. There is also only one head gasket to be concerned about. The intake and exhaust systems are significantly simple.
![]() |
DOHC four-cylinder inline engine |
A boxer engine requires two heads and extra cams, two exhaust manifolds, and a complicated intake manifold. The engine block is far more complex than an inline, and it cannot be built with a one-piece block. As a result, The Boxer configuration is much more complex than inline.
![]() |
Boxer engine exploded view |
Maintenance
In boxer engines, Parts are hidden beneath the engine. Because the heads face the fenders rather than the outside air, space might be limited while replacing spark plugs or heads. In addition, rather than lifting the main caps, the engine cases must be split to remove the crankshaft as in an inline.
![]() |
Subaru EJ251 engine photo by Fletcher6/wikicommons |
Inline engines are easier to maintain. Compared to flat designs, everything is easily accessible. Because inline engines are thin, the typical I4 is ideally suited to transverse FWD vehicles.
![]() |
A BMW M20B25 engine with the cylinder head removed, By Kether83 Wiki commons |
Cost
The additional complexity of boxer engines raises the engine's cost. In addition, difficult maintenance increases maintenance expenses. In comparison, inline engines fewer parts cost less, even if they are bigger, such as one head gasket for four cylinders instead of two heads for boxers. In addition, Fewer catalytic converters are required in inlines, resulting in significant cost savings.
![]() |
Subaru Impreza FB20 Flat-4 2.0-liter DOHC 16 valve dual-AVCS gasoline direct injection engine. photo by Qurren/ Wikimedia |
Reliability
Reliability is a direct outcome of simplicity. In situations where dependability is critical (such as diesel engines used in large vehicles and maritime applications), inlines are superiors.
Size
![]() |
Subaru flat 12 engine |
As the number of cylinders rises, inline engines can become unmanageably lengthy, making it very hard to fit in an engine bay. As a result, inline engines are generally limited to six cylinders (though I8s are sometimes manufactured). Even I6s are difficult to fit in many vehicles, especially in transverse layout. The boxer engine is shorter for a given number of cylinders. It is typically laying flat in the car, occupying up less space.
![]() |
Stutz car with inline 8 engine. source: conceptcarz.com |
Center of gravity
Because Boxer engines are lower, the vehicle has a lower center of gravity. This can improve handling.
Balance
Inline engines have Issues with balance, particularly on larger displacement I4 engines. Balance shafts are required on a large number of these engines to reduce vibrations. This increases the cost and weight of the item.
![]() |
Boxer vs other engines layout balance. Source: drivetribe.com |
Inline six engines are exceptionally balanced because they have an even firing interval. But lengthy crankshafts in inline engines with six or more cylinders cause torsional vibrations. This can potentially cause engine damage. This also limits the number of cylinders.
A boxer engine is well balanced, and they don't require a balance shaft to reduce secondary vibrations. exceptionally the boxer twin-engine, which is only two cylinders which BMW motorcycles application in motorbikes is not that balanced, and it requires a balance shaft
|
Working model of a four-cylinder boxer engine |
Is the Boxer engine better than inline?For an odd number of cylinders, boxers don't exist, while inlines are the best because they have minimum primary and secondary vibrations.
The Boxer engine is better balanced, has a lower center of gravity, and occupies shorter space than an inline. However, it's more complicated, expensive, and harder to maintain, leading to reliability issues. I love to hear your thoughts. What do you think of both engines, and which configuration do you prefer? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Post a Comment